There’s old conventional wisdom that says it’s easier to get a new job while you’re in a job, rather than when you’re unemployed.
Why is that? Simply because employers are biased against the unemployed? Or is there something else going on?
While there are some employers who have biases against people who are unemployed, that’s generally not true in the vast majority of cases.
Some employers do believe that if someone was let go from a previous position, there must have been a reason for it. Companies generally don’t want to lose their best people, so some employers assume that if you were let go, you must not have been that good.
Particularly in today's job market, that view is very unfounded.
Today, when companies are looking to make drastic cuts to their budgets, they often chop with an axe instead of carving carefully with a scalpel to keep the people they want. They often eliminate entire divisions, departments, or teams. Sometimes they make decisions purely based on seniority or job functions. Sometimes they look for the biggest salaries to cut, or other arbitrary criteria that have nothing to do with an individual’s performance.
A bias against unemployed / laid-off candidates is by far the exception rather than the rule since it is not a solid criteria for evaluating a prospective employee.
More often than not… unemployed candidates are too eager! While employers want to find candidates who are enthusiastic, passionate, and have a desire to be at their organization, unemployed candidates often stand out as taking it a little too far.
Employed candidates, who don’t need a new job, generally spend their time evaluating the employer as much as the employer is evaluating them. They are more "hard to get."
Similar to dating… generally the person who is a little harder to get is often perceived as more attractive than the one that’s too "easy." To an employer, the hard-to-get candidate is perceived as more confident and professional.
How does "too eager" look in an interview?
How have you looked to a potential employer? A little over-eager, or somewhat hard to get? You may find that a slight shift in your perspective can give you better results!
Hiring someone who doesn't work out - a "bad hire" - is a very expensive thing for any employer to do:
And, the person who selected the "bad hire" doesn't look very smart or capable to his or her boss, either (imagine how picky they will be next time).
Of course, things aren't rosy for the person who was the bad hire, either!
If you are unemployed, try to approach your job search with the mind set of someone who still has a job. Don't eagerly talk your way into any job - particularly an inappropriate job. Avoid becoming the "bad hire" who is job hunting again, too soon. Be more thoughtful and careful in your approach to landing your next job so you are the "good hire" who happily stays a long time, is well-paid, and adds great accomplishments to your resume.
Harry Urschel has over 25 years experience as an independent recruiter in Minnesota. He currently operates as e-Executives, writes a blog for Job Seekers called The Wise Job Search, and can be found on Twitter as @eExecutives and on Google +. He can be contacted by email at: firstname.lastname@example.org